Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Defining and investigating occupational asthma: a consensus approach

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Madeline Campbell

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Background: At present there is no internationally agreed definition of occupational asthma and there is a lack of guidance regarding the resources that should be readily available to physicians running specialist occupational asthma services. Aims: To agree a working definition of occupational asthma and to develop a framework of resources necessary to run a specialist occupational asthma clinic. Method: A modified RAND appropriateness method was used to gain a consensus of opinion from an expert panel of clinicians running specialist occupational asthma clinics in the UK. Results: Consensus was reached over 10 terms defining occupational asthma including: occupational asthma is defined as asthma induced by exposure in the working environment to airborne dusts vapours or fumes, with or without pre-existing asthma; occupational asthma encompasses the terms "sensitiser-induced asthma'' and "acute irritant-induced asthma'' ( reactive airways dysfunction syndrome ( RADS)); acute irritant-induced asthma is a type of occupational asthma where there is no latency and no immunological sensitisation and should only be used when a single high exposure has occurred; and the term "work-related asthma'' can be used to include occupational asthma, acute irritant-induced asthma ( RADS) and aggravation of pre-existing asthma. Disagreement arose on whether low dose irritant-induced asthma existed, but the panel agreed that if it did exist they would include it in the definition of "work-related asthma''. The panel agreed on a set of 18 resources which should be available to a specialist occupational asthma service. These included pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and FVC (% predicted); peak flow monitoring ( and plotting of results, OASYS II analysis); non-specific provocation challenge in the laboratory and specific IgE to a wide variety of occupational agents. Conclusion: It is hoped that the outcome of this process will improve uniformity of definition and investigation of occupational asthma across the UK.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Francis C, Prys-Picard CO, Fishwick D, Stenton C, Burge PS, Bradshaw LM, Ayres JG, Campbell M, Niven RM

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Year: 2007

Volume: 64

Issue: 6

Pages: 361-365

ISSN (print): 1351-0711

ISSN (electronic): 1470-7926

Publisher: BMJ Group

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.2006.028902

DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.028902


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share