Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Mollie Gerver
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
States are increasingly paying refugees to repatriate, hoping to decrease the number of refugees residing within their borders. Drawing on in-depth interviews from East Africa and data from Israeli Labour Statistics, I provide a description of such payment schemes and consider whether they are morally permissible. In doing so, I address two types of cases. In the first type of case, governments pay refugees to repatriate to high-risk countries, never coercing them into returning. I argue that such payments are permissible if refugees’ choices are voluntary and if states allow refugees to return to the host country in the event of an emergency. I then describe cases where states detain refugees, and non-governmental organisations provide their own payments to refugees wishing to repatriate. In such cases, non-governmental organisations are only permitted to provide payments if the funds are sufficient to ensure post-return safety and if providing payments does not reinforce the government’s detention policy.
Author(s): Gerver M
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Political Studies
Year: 2017
Volume: 65
Issue: 3
Pages: 631-645
Print publication date: 01/10/2017
Online publication date: 30/01/2017
Acceptance date: 12/09/2016
Date deposited: 10/10/2017
ISSN (print): 0032-3217
ISSN (electronic): 1467-9248
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716677607
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716677607
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric