The relative quality and cost-effectiveness of private and public schools for low-income families: a case study in a developing country

  1. Lookup NU author(s)
  2. Professor James Tooley
  3. Dr Pauline Dixon
Author(s)Tooley J, Dixon P, Shamsan Y, Schagen I
Publication type Article
JournalSchool Effectiveness and School Improvement
Year2010
Volume21
Issue2
Pages117-144
ISSN (print)0924-3453
ISSN (electronic)1744-5124
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The “mushrooming” of private schools for low-income families has been widely noted in the literature; however, very little is known about the quality of these schools. This research explored the relative quality of private unaided (recognised and unrecognised) and government schools in low-income areas of Hyderabad, India. A preliminary census to locate unrecognised private schools - not on official lists - was conducted. Data were collected on achievement and background variables for 3,910 pupils from a stratified random sample of schools. Using multilevel modelling shows that pupils in private unrecognised and recognised schools, when controlled for age, pupil's IQ, and class average IQ, achieve higher scores in mathematics and English than equivalent pupils in government schools. There is no significant difference between private and government schools in pupil achievement in Urdu. The achievement advantage for private schools did not arise because of greater resources available, at least in terms of per pupil teacher salaries.
PublisherRoutledge
URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243450903255482
DOI10.1080/09243450903255482
Actions    Link to this publication