Boundary organizations for sustainable land management: The example of Dutch Environmental Co-operatives

  1. Lookup NU author(s)
  2. Dr Jeremy Robert Franks
Author(s)Franks JR
Publication type Article
JournalEcological Economics
Year2010
Volume70
Issue2
Pages283-295
ISSN (print)0921-8009
ISSN (electronic)1873-6106
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This paper uses Boundary Organization Theory (BOT) to examine the proposition that Dutch Environmental Co-operatives (ECs) conform to the characteristics of boundary organizations (BOs). Many conservationists believe BO-type institutions are essential for addressing eco-system management problems, but believe there are currently too few examples of BOs working across sustainability issues. It is concluded that ECs have organizational structures and work practices typical of BOs: they allow people on different sides of the land management for food and nature conservation boundary (land managers, conservationists, scientists and policy makers) to negotiate to transform agri-environmental schemes into boundary objects and scheme options into implementable standardized packages. This is achieved by adopting convening, translation, collaboration and mediation functions that create extended peer communities able to contribute important knowledge of eco-system management, whilst allowing each participate to remain within their respective professional boundaries and responsible to their different constituencies. As an example of BOs, ECs are a post-normal sustainability technology (PNST) that offers “clumsy” solutions to the “wicked” problem of eco-system management. BOs work in many fields across the globe, showing their underling organizational principals and working practices are not restricted to any particular issue or geographical monopoly. As such, ECs – adjusted to suit local priorities and circumstances – could be the basis of a more widely used sustainability-led governance unit most particularly where cultural practices favour collective and collaborative behaviour.
PublisherElsevier
URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.011
DOI10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.011
Actions    Link to this publication