Whose agenda? Securitisation and prosecution in anti-trafficking: some lessons from Nepal

  1. Lookup NU author(s)
  2. Professor Nina Laurie
  3. Dr Meena Poudel
  4. Dr Janet Townsend
Author(s)Laurie N, Poudel M, Richardson D, Townsend JG
Editor(s)
Publication type Conference Proceedings (inc. Abstract)
Conference NameInstitute of British Geographers
Conference LocationEdinburgh, UK
Year of Conference2012
Legacy Date3-5 July 2012
Volume
Pages
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Donor interests and policy initiatives in anti-trafficking globally have come to focus increasingly on securitisation issues in recent years. Anti-trafficking legislation and development funding have subsequently become tied more and more to agendas that aim to tackle the global flows and networks associated with terrorism and organised crime. How do such interests shape the practices and effectiveness of anti-trafficking advocates in specific local settings? How do women who have been affected by trafficking experience criminal justice systems and Non Government Organisation activities relating to prosecution in their own countries and abroad? To what extent do these women see criminalisation and prosecution as the most important ways to prevent other women facing the same experiences?