Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Processing of Facial Emotion in Bipolar Depression and Euthymia

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Lucy Robinson, Dr John Gray, Emeritus Professor Nicol Ferrier, Dr Peter GallagherORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).


Abstract

Previous studies of facial emotion processing in bipolar disorder (BD) have reported conflicting findings. In independently conducted studies, we investigate facial emotion labeling in euthymic and depressed BD patients using tasks with static and dynamically morphed images of different emotions displayed at different intensities. Study 1 included 38 euthymic BD patients and 28 controls. Participants completed two tasks: labeling of static images of basic facial emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happy, sad) shown at different expression intensities; the Eyes Test (Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill, Raste, & Plumb, 2001), which involves recognition of complex emotions using only the eye region of the face. Study 2 included 53 depressed BD patients and 47 controls. Participants completed two tasks: labeling of "dynamic" facial expressions of the same five basic emotions; the Emotional Hexagon test (Young, Perret, Calder, Sprengelmeyer, & Ekman, 2002). There were no significant group differences on any measures of emotion perception/labeling, compared to controls. A significant group by intensity interaction was observed in both emotion labeling tasks (euthymia and depression), although this effect did not survive the addition of measures of executive function/psychomotor speed as covariates. Only 2.6-15.8% of euthymic patients and 7.8-13.7% of depressed patients scored below the 10th percentile of the controls for total emotion recognition accuracy. There was no evidence of specific deficits in facial emotion labeling in euthymic or depressed BD patients. Methodological variations-including mood state, sample size, and the cognitive demands of the tasks-may contribute significantly to the variability in findings between studies.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Robinson LJ, Gray JM, Burt M, Ferrier IN, Gallagher P

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Year: 2015

Volume: 21

Issue: 9

Pages: 709-721

Print publication date: 01/10/2015

Online publication date: 19/10/2015

Acceptance date: 04/09/2015

Date deposited: 23/10/2015

ISSN (print): 1355-6177

ISSN (electronic): 1469-7661

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355617715000909

DOI: 10.1017/S1355617715000909

PubMed id: 26477679


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
03T-429Stanley Medical Research Institute
GU0401207Medical Research Council

Share