Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Andrew GenneryORCiD, Professor Mary Slatter
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is 1 of the most common indications for pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with primary immunodeficiency. Historically, SCID was diagnosed in infants who presented with opportunistic infections within the first year of life. With newborn screening (NBS) for SCID in most of the United States, the majority of infants with SCID are now diagnosed and treated in the first 3.5 months of life; however, in the rest of the world, the lack of NBS means that most infants with SCID still present with infections. The average survival for SCID patients who have undergone transplantation currently is >70% at 3 years after transplantation, although this can vary significantly based on multiple factors, including age and infection status at the time of transplantation, type of donor source utilized, manipulation of graft before transplantation, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, type of conditioning (if any) utilized, and underlying genotype of SCID. In at least 1 study of SCID patients who received no conditioning, long-term survival was 77% at 8.7 years (range out to 26 years) after transplantation. Although a majority of patients with SCID will engraft T cells without any conditioning therapy, depending on genotype, donor source, HLA match, and presence of circulating maternal cells, a sizable percentage of these will fail to achieve full immune reconstitution. Without conditioning, T cell reconstitution typically occurs, although not always fully, whereas B cell engraftment does not, leaving some molecular types of SCID patients with intrinsically defective B cells, in most cases, dependent on regular infusions of immunoglobulin. Because of this, many centers have used conditioning with alkylating agents including busulfan or melphalan known to open marrow niches in attempts to achieve B cell reconstitution. Thus, it is imperative that we understand the potential late effects of these agents in this patient population. There are also nonimmunologic risks associated with HCT for SCID that appear to be dependent upon the genotype of the patient. In this report, we have evaluated the published data on late effects and attempted to summarize the known risks associated with conditioning and alternative donor sources. These data, while informative, are also a clear demonstration that there is still much to be learned from the SCID population in terms of their post-HCT outcomes. This paper will summarize current findings and recommend further research in areas considered high priority. Specific guidelines regarding a recommended approach to long-term follow-up, including laboratory and clinical monitoring, will be forthcoming in a subsequent paper.
Author(s): Heimall J, Puck J, Buckley R, Fleisher TA, Gennery AR, Neven B, Slatter M, Haddad E, Notarangelo LD, Baker KS, Dietz AC, Duncan C, Pulsipher MA, Cowan MJ
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Year: 2017
Volume: 23
Issue: 3
Pages: 379-387
Print publication date: 01/03/2017
Online publication date: 06/01/2017
Acceptance date: 07/12/2016
ISSN (print): 1083-8791
ISSN (electronic): 1523-6536
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.12.619
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.12.619
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
