Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Vasilis SarhosisORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
This paper investigates the influence of construction method (e.g. false skew, helicoidal and logarithmic method) on the mechanical behaviour and load carrying capacity of single span skew masonry arches. Simulations were performed with the three dimensional computational software, based on the Discrete Element Method of analysis. Each stone/brick of the masonry skew arch was represented by a distinct block. Mortar joints were modelled as zero thickness interfaces which can open and close depending on the magnitude and direction of the stresses applied to them. The variables investigated were the construction method, the angle of skew, the size of masonry blocks and the critical location of the live load along the span of the arch. At each skew arch, a full width vertical line load was applied incrementally until collapse. From the results analysis, it was found that for a skew masonry arch constructed using the false skew method, as the angle of skew increase, sliding between voussoirs in the arch increases and failure load decreases. However, for skew masonry arches constructed using the helicoidal and logarithmic method, as the angle of skew increases, the failure load increases. Three different characteristic failure modes were identified depending on the contact friction angle and the method of construction. These observations provide new insight into the behaviour and lead to suggestions for understanding the load carrying capacity and failure mode of skew arches
Author(s): Forgács T, Sarhosis V, Bagi K
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Engineering Structures
Year: 2018
Volume: 168
Issue: 1
Pages: 612–627
Print publication date: 01/08/2018
Online publication date: 10/05/2018
Acceptance date: 10/05/2018
Date deposited: 10/05/2018
ISSN (print): 0141-0296
Publisher: Elsevier
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.005
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric