Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jytte Seested Nielsen,
Professor Susan Chilton,
Emeritus Professor Michael Jones-Lee,
Dr Hugh Metcalf
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This paper reports the results of an empirical study investigating people's preferences over three different types of perturbation to their survival function, each perturbation generating the same gain in life expectancy. Preferences over the three different perturbations were found to be distributed more or less evenly across the subject pool. Use of a novel experimental methodology generated economically consistent and intuitively plausible responses to (necessarily) hypothetical questions concerning improvements in life expectancy by first allowing respondents to gain experience while making similar choices in an incentivized setting involving financial risk. The results demonstrate the potential for economic experiments to contribute to the development of more robust methods for policy evaluation in domains where physical risk is an important factor.
Author(s): Seested-Nielsen J, Chilton S, Jones-Lee M, Metcalf H
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Print publication date: 01/12/2010
ISSN (print): 0895-5646
ISSN (electronic): 1573-0476
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric