Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Enhanced liver fibrosis test can predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Chris Day

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Background: Clinicians use fibrosis in a liver biopsy to predict clinical outcomes of chronic liver disease. The performance of non-invasive tests has been evaluated against histological assessment of fibrosis but use of clinical outcomes as the reference standard would be ideal. The enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test was derived and validated in a large cohort of patients and shown to have high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve (AUC)=0.80 95% CI 0.76 to 0.85) in identification of significant fibrosis on biopsy. Objective: To evaluate ELF performance in predicting clinical outcomes by following up the original ELF cohort. Methods: Patients recruited to the ELF study at seven English centres were followed up for liver morbidity and mortality by examination of clinical data. Defaulting/ discharged patients were followed up by family practitioner questionnaires. Primary outcome measure was liver-related morbidity/liver-related death. Results: 457 patients were followed up (median 7 years), with ascertainment of clinical status in 92%. There were 61 liver-related outcomes (39 deaths). Survival analysis showed that the ELF score predicts liver outcomes, with people having the highest ELF scores being significantly more likely to have clinical outcomes than those in lower-score groups. A Cox proportional hazards model showed fully adjusted HRs of 75 (ELF score 12.52-16.67), 20 (10.426-12.51) and 5 (8.34-10.425) compared with patients with ELF <8.34. A unit change in ELF is associated with a doubling of risk of liver-related outcome. Conclusions: An ELF test can predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease and may be a useful prognostic tool in clinical practice.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Parkes J, Roderick P, Harris S, Day C, Mutimer D, Collier J, Lombard M, Alexander G, Ramage J, Dusheiko G, Wheatley M, Gough C, Burt A, Rosenberg W

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Gut

Year: 2010

Volume: 59

Issue: 9

Pages: 1245-1251

Print publication date: 30/07/2010

ISSN (print): 0017-5749

ISSN (electronic): 1468-3288

Publisher: BMJ Group

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gut.2009.203166

DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.203166

PubMed id: 20675693


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share