Lookup NU author(s):
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This article is an exploration of how power has been exercised over the future of part of a rural town in Lancashire, North West England. The article reviews a decade of debates about what should be done with the area, and draws loose comparisons between practices at various stages of the story and three conceptual frameworks from planning theory. The stages are likened to the theories of rational-comprehensive planning, agonism and communicative planning. This story is characterised by the attempts of spatially or deliberatively remote actors to define the area's future, and to justify this by recourse to one or more master narratives. The article appraises how successful each of the three planning theories have been at regulating these attempts to impose the area's future. It builds on existing critiques of rational planning and communicative planning and shows how, in this instance; well resourced agonistic debate was more effective at promoting the importance of disparate values and non-expert knowledge.
Author(s): Webb D
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Open House International
Print publication date: 01/01/2010
ISSN (print): 0168-2601
Publisher: Open House Publishing