Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Susan Lord, Linda Errington, Professor Lynn RochesterORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Gait variability (stride-to-stride fluctuations) is used increasingly as a marker for gait performance and future mobility status, cognitive status, and falls. This structured review explicitly examined literature that reported on the reliability, validity and responsiveness of gait variability in older adults. We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PEDRO, Biomechanics, SportDiscus and PsycInfo databases. Two independent reviewers undertook data extraction, with adjudication by a third reviewer in cases of disagreement. Twenty-two full papers were screened and 10 met the predefined inclusion criteria, involving 1036 participants who were mainly community dwelling older adults in their 8th decade. A wide range of gait variability parameters, testing protocols and calculations of gait variability were reported. Reliability estimates varied, but were mostly fair to moderate. Concurrent validity was established for stance time variability and change estimates were reported for stance time and swing time. Standard of reporting was generally poor, with insufficient detail provided for aspects of measurement and testing protocols. Further research is required to standardise testing procedures and establish reliability, responsiveness and validity for confident use of gait variability as a robust measure. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Simpson L; Rochester L; Lord S; Howe T; Greenland J
Publication type: Review
Publication status: Published
Journal: Gait & Posture
Year: 2011
Volume: 34
Issue: 4
Pages: 443-450
Print publication date: 15/09/2011
ISSN (print): 0966-6362
ISSN (electronic): 1879-2219
Publisher: ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.010
