Lookup NU author(s): Professor Falko Sniehotta,
Dr Justin Presseau,
Dr Nicola O'Brien,
Professor Vera Araujo Soares
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Objective: To investigate the suitability of N-of-1 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as a means of testing the effectiveness of behavior change techniques based on self-regulation theory (goal setting and self-monitoring) for promoting walking in healthy adult volunteers. Method: A series of N-of-1 RCTs in 10 normal and overweight adults aged 19-67 (mean=36.9 years). We randomly allocated 60 days within each individual to text message-prompted daily goal-setting and/or self-monitoring interventions in accordance to a 2(step-count goal prompt vs. alternative goal prompt)*2(self-monitoring: open vs. blinded Omron-HJ-113-E pedometer) factorial design. Aggregated data were analyzed using random intercept multilevel models. Single cases were individually analyzed. The primary outcome was daily pedometer step counts over 60 days. Results: Single case analyses showed that 4 participants significantly increased walking: 2 on self-monitoring days and 2 on goal setting days, compared to control days. Six participants did not benefit from the interventions. In aggregated analyses, mean step counts were higher on goal-setting days (8499.9 vs. 7956.3) and on self-monitoring days (8630.3 vs. 7825.9). Multilevel analyses showed a significant effect of the self-monitoring condition (p= 0.025), the goal setting condition approached significance (p=.08) and there was a small linear increase in walking over time (p=.03). Conclusion: N-of-1 randomized trials are a suitable means to test behavioral interventions in individual participants.
Author(s): Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Hobbs N, Araújo-Soares V
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Health Psychology
Print publication date: 20/02/2012
ISSN (print): 0278-6133
ISSN (electronic): 1930-7810
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric