Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Assessment of competency in clinical measurement: comparison of two forms of sequential test and sensitivity of test error rates to parameter choice

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Andrew Sims, Kim Keltie, Professor Steve Robson

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Objective: To assess clinical measurement competency by two sequential test formulations [resetting sequential probability ratio test (R-SPRT) and learning curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM)]. Design: Numerical simulation and retrospective observational study. Setting: Obstetric ultrasound department. Participants: Cohorts of 10 000 simulated trainees and 62 obstetric sonographers training in nuchal translucency (NT) measurement at the 11–14-week pregnancy scan with limited case availability. Intervention: Application of LC-CUSUM and R-SPRT to clinical measurement training. Main Outcome Measures: Proportions of real trainees achieving competency by LC-CUSUM and R-SPRT, proportions of simulated competent trainees not achieving competency (Type I error), proportions of simulated incompetent trainees achieving competency (Type II error), distribution of case number required to achieve competency (run length) and frequency of resets. Results: For simulated cohorts, significant differences in run-length distribution and true test error rates were found between the R-SPRT and LC-CUSUM tests with equivalent parameters. Increasing the cases available to each trainee reduced the Type I error rate but increased the Type II error rate for both sequential tests for all choices of unacceptable failure rate. Discontinuities in the proportion of trainees expected to be test competent were found at critical values of unacceptable failure rate. Conclusions: With equivalent parameters, the R-SPRT and LC-CUSUM formulations of sequential tests produced different outcomes, demonstrating that the choice of test method, as well as the choice of parameters, is important in designing a training scheme. The R-SPRT detects incompetence as well as competence and may indicate need for further training. Simulations are valuable in estimating the proportions of trainees expected to be assessed as competent.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Sims AJ, Keltie K, Burn J, Robson SC

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Year: 2013

Volume: 25

Issue: 3

Pages: 322-330

Print publication date: 04/04/2013

ISSN (print): 1353-4505

ISSN (electronic): 1464-3677

Publisher: Oxford University Press

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzt028

DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt028

Notes:


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Actions

Find at Newcastle University icon    Link to this publication


Share