Lookup NU author(s): Paul Baker,
Dr Peter Avery,
Professor David Deehan
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Patella resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Variation in published results for patella resurfacing may potentially be explained by differences in design between TKA brands. We interrogated NJR-PROMs data to ascertain whether there is an early functional benefit to resurfacing the patella, both overall and for each of the five most popular primary knee designs through use of the Oxford Knee Score. A total of 8103 resurfaced TKAs and 15,290 nonresurfaced TKAs were studied. There was a large variation in the proportion of knees undergoing patella resurfacing by brand (Nexgen = 16% versus Triathlon = 52%). Patellar resurfacing did not significantly influence the magnitude of improvement in overall knee function or anterior knee-specific function irrespective of TKA brand or for cruciate retaining versus sacrificing designs. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Baker PN, Petheram T, Dowen D, Jameson SS, Avery PJ, Reed MR, Deehan DJ
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Arthroplasty
Print publication date: 01/02/2014
ISSN (print): 0883-5403
ISSN (electronic): 1532-8406
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric