ePrints

"I assumed that one was a placebo": Exploring the consent process in a sham controlled acupressure trial

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Matthew Breckons

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.

Abstract

Objectives: In clinical trials where participants are likely to be able to distinguish between true and sham interventions, informing participants that they may receive a sham intervention increases the likelihood of participants 'breaking the blind' and invalidating trial findings. The present study explored participants' perceptions of the consent process in a sham controlled acupressure trial which did not explicitly indicate participants may receive a sham intervention.Design: Nested qualitative study within a randomised sham controlled trial of acupressure wristbands for chemotherapy-related nausea. Convenience sample of 26 patients participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts analysed thematically using framework analysis. Setting: Study conducted within three geographical sites in the UK: Manchester, Liverpool, and Plymouth.Results: All participants indicated that they believed they were fully informed when providing written consent to participate in the trial. Participants' perceived it was acceptable to employ a sham intervention within the trial of acupressure wristbands without informing potential participants that they may receive a sham treatment. Despite the fact that participants were not informed that one of the treatment arms was a sham intervention the majority indicated they assumed one of the treatment arms would be placebo.Conclusions: Many trials of acupuncture and acupressure do not inform participants they may receive a sham intervention. The current study indicates patients' perceive this approach to the consent process as acceptable. However, the fact participants assume one treatment may be placebo threatens the methodological basis for utilising this approach to the consent process. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Hughes JG, Russell W, Breckons M, Richardson J, Lloyd-Williams M, Molassiotis A

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Complementary Therapies in Medicine

Year: 2014

Volume: 22

Issue: 5

Pages: 903-908

Print publication date: 01/10/2014

Online publication date: 19/07/2014

Acceptance date: 01/01/1900

ISSN (print): 0965-2299

ISSN (electronic): 1873-6963

Publisher: Churchill Livingstone

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2014.07.005

DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2014.07.005

Altmetrics

Funding

Share