Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Case-based discussions: UK surgical trainee perceptions

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Alexander PhillipsORCiD, Dr Anantha Madhavan, David Macafee

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Background: An increasing emphasis on accountability led to the development of the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Project (ISCP) in the UK. A major feature of ISCP was a focus on competence with the institution of formative assessments to aid learning and provide portfolio evidence. Case-based discussions (CBDs) are one of the main formative assessments used at all stages of training. The aim of this study was to review the use of CBDs by surgical trainees to determine if and when they are useful, and whether they are perceived as being used correctly. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with both higher and core surgical trainees. Inductive reasoning principles were used to analyse and interpret the responses to open questions. Common themes were determined and thematic analysis was carried out. Results: Forty-two surgical trainees (21 core and 21 higher trainees) were interviewed. Core trainees felt that CBDs were more likely to be used correctly, and both groups thought that they were a positive feature of training. Few stated that they were used to shape training needs. Positive themes identified included the provision of feedback, identifying learning portfolio evidence and encouraging reflection. Negative themes included a 'tick-box' mentality and that the value was diminished by a lack of engagement with the process from trainers. Case-based discussions are one of the main formative assessments used at all stages of training Conclusion: Trainees regarded CBDs as a positive feature allowing the discussion of complicated cases, and encouraging higher thinking and reflection; however, concerns were raised regarding their implementation, which has led to a diminishing of their value.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Phillips A, Lim J, Madhavan A, Macafee D

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Clinical Teacher

Year: 2016

Volume: 13

Issue: 3

Pages: 207-212

Print publication date: 01/06/2016

Online publication date: 29/05/2015

Acceptance date: 01/01/1900

ISSN (print): 1743-4971

ISSN (electronic): 1743-498X

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12411

DOI: 10.1111/tct.12411


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share