Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Evaluating a systematic voiding programme for patients with urinary incontinence after stroke in secondary care using soft systems analysis and Normalisation Process Theory: Findings from the ICONS case study phase

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Elaine McColl, Professor Helen Rodgers, Dr Katie Brittain

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) affects between 40 and 60% of people in hospital after stroke, but is often poorly managed in stroke units. Objectives: To inform an exploratory trial by three methods: identifying the organisational context for embedding the SVP; exploring health professionals' views around embedding the SVP and measuring presence/absence of UI and frequency of UI episodes at baseline and six weeks post-stroke. Design: A mixed methods single case study included analysis of organisational context using interviews with clinical leaders analysed with soft systems methodology, a process evaluation using interviews with staff delivering the intervention and analysed with Normalisation Process Theory, and outcome evaluation using data from patients receiving the SVP and analysed using descriptive statistics. Setting: An 18 bed acute stroke unit in a large Foundation Trust (a 'not for profit' privately controlled entity not accountable to the UK Department of Health) serving a population of 370,000. Participants: Health professionals and clinical leaders with a role in either delivering the SVP or linking with it in any capacity were recruited following informed consent. Patients were recruited meeting the following inclusion criteria: aged 18 or over with a diagnosis of stroke; urinary incontinence (UI) as defined by the International Continence Society; conscious; medically stable as judged by the clinical team and with incontinence classified as stress, urge, mixed or 'functional'.All patients admitted to the unit during the intervention period were screened for eligibility; informed consent to collect baseline and outcome data was sought from all eligible patients. Results: Organisational context: 18 health professionals took part in four group interviews. Findings suggest an environment not conducive to therapeutic continence management and a focus on containment of UI. Embedding the SVP into practice: 21 nursing staff took part in six group interviews. Initial confusion gave way to embedding of processes facilitated by new routines and procedures. Patient outcome: 43 patients were recruited; 28 of these commenced the SVP. Of these, 6/28 (21%) were continent at six weeks post-stroke or discharge. Conclusion: It was possible to embed the SVP into practice despite an organisational context not conducive to therapeutic continence care. Recommendations are made for introducing the SVP in a trial context. © 2014.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Thomas LH, French B, Burton CR, Sutton C, Forshaw D, Dickinson H, Leathley MJ, Britt D, Roe B, Cheater FM, Booth J, Watkins CL, Thomas LH, Watkins CL, French B, Sutton C, Forshaw D, Leathley MJ, Carter B, Cheater F, Booth J, Roe B, Burton C, McColl E, Rodgers H, Brittain K, Walker A, Barrett J, Whiteley G, Dave, Brand P, Britt D, Griffiths M, Helvin P, James B, Pearl G, Whitewood J, Vella J, Audrey, Childs R, Crosby S, Hall S, Lewin A, Royle L, Scott C, Wright J

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: International Journal of Nursing Studies

Year: 2014

Volume: 51

Issue: 10

Pages: 1308-1320

Print publication date: 01/10/2014

Online publication date: 20/02/2014

Acceptance date: 09/02/2014

ISSN (print): 0020-7489

ISSN (electronic): 1873-491X

Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.009

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.009

PubMed id: 24656435


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Actions

Find at Newcastle University icon    Link to this publication


Share