Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Use of a 3-Item Short-Form Version of the Barthel Index for Use in Stroke

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Helen Rodgers

Downloads


Licence

This is the authors' accepted manuscript of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2017.

For re-use rights please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.


Abstract

© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.Background and Purpose - There may be a potential to reduce the number of items assessed in the Barthel Index (BI), and shortened versions of the BI have been described. We sought to collate all existing short-form BI (SF-BI) and perform a comparative validation using clinical trial data. Methods - We performed a systematic review across multidisciplinary electronic databases to find all published SF-BI. Our validation used the VISTA (Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive) resource. We describe concurrent validity (agreement of each SF-BI with BI), convergent and divergent validity (agreement of each SF-BI with other outcome measures available in the data set), predictive validity (association of prognostic factors with SF-BI outcomes), and content validity (item correlation and exploratory factor analyses). Results - From 3546 titles, we found 8 articles describing 6 differing SF-BI. Using acute trial data (n=8852), internal reliability suggested redundancy in BI (Cronbach α, 0.96). Each SF-BI demonstrated a strong correlation with BI, modified Rankin Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (all ρ≥0.83; P<0.001). Using rehabilitation trial data (n=332), SF-BI demonstrated modest correlation with quality of life measures Stroke Impact Scale and 5 domain EuroQOL (ρ≥0.50, P<0.001). Prespecified prognostic factors were associated with SF-BI outcomes (all P<0.001). Our factor analysis described a 3 factor structure, and item reduction suggested an optimal 3-item SF-BI comprising bladder control, transfer, and mobility items in keeping with 1 of the 3-item SF-BI previously described in the literature. Conclusions - There is redundancy in the original BI; we have demonstrated internal and external validity of a 3-item SF-BI that should be simple to use.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Macisaac RL, Ali M, Taylor-Rowan M, Rodgers H, Lees KR, Quinn TJ

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Stroke

Year: 2017

Volume: 48

Issue: 3

Pages: 618-623

Print publication date: 01/03/2017

Online publication date: 02/02/2017

Acceptance date: 19/12/2016

ISSN (print): 0039-2499

ISSN (electronic): 1524-4628

Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

URL: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014789

DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014789


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Actions

Find at Newcastle University icon    Link to this publication


Share