ePrints

Do hospitals owe a so-called 'non-delegable duty of care' to their patients?

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Christine Beuermann

Downloads

• Accepted version [.pdf]

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Abstract

It is not uncommon for the duty of care owed by a hospital to its patients to be described as ‘nondelegable’. Use of this label suggests that a hospital may be held strictly liable to a patient for the wrongdoing of a third party beyond the circumstances in which vicarious liability might be imposed. To date, no higher court has used the label to impose such liability. Notwithstanding, it was assumed by Lord Sumption in Woodland v Swimming Teachers Association that the duty of care owed by a hospital to a patient could be so described when formulating his test for determining the existence of a ‘non-delegable duty of care’. This article challenges that assumption and, in turn, the veracity of the test devised by Lord Sumption.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Beuermann C

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Medical Law Review

Year: 2018

Volume: 26

Issue: 1

Pages: 1-26

Print publication date: 01/02/2018

Online publication date: 08/09/2017

Acceptance date: 19/06/2017

Date deposited: 13/07/2017

ISSN (print): 0967-0742

ISSN (electronic): 1464-3790

Publisher: Oxford University Press

URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwx040

DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx040

Altmetrics

Share