Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor James WasonORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Multi-arm multi-stage trials can improve the efficiency of the drug development process when multiple new treatments are available for testing. A group-sequential approach can be used in order to design multi-arm multi-stage trials, using an extension to Dunnett’s multiple-testing procedure. The actual sample size used in such a trial is a random variable that has high variability. This can cause problems when applying for funding as the cost will also be generally highly variable. This motivates a type of design that provides the efficiency advantages of a group-sequential multi-arm multi-stage design, but has a fixed sample size. One such design is the two-stage drop-the-losers design, in which a number of experimental treatments, and a control treatment, are assessed at a prescheduled interim analysis. The best-performing experimental treatment and the control treatment then continue to a second stage. In this paper, we discuss extending this design to have more than two stages, which is shown to considerably reduce the sample size required. We also compare the resulting sample size requirements to the sample size distribution of analogous group-sequential multi-arm multi-stage designs. The sample size required for a multi-stage drop-the-losers design is usually higher than, but close to, the median sample size of a group-sequential multi-arm multi-stage trial. In many practical scenarios, the disadvantage of a slight loss in average efficiency would be overcome by the huge advantage of a fixed sample size. We assess the impact of delay between recruitment and assessment as well as unknown variance on the drop-the-losers designs.
Author(s): Wason J, Stallard N, Bowden J, Jennison C
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Year: 2017
Volume: 26
Issue: 2
Pages: 508-524
Print publication date: 02/01/2017
Online publication date: 16/09/2014
Acceptance date: 19/08/2014
Date deposited: 17/08/2017
ISSN (print): 0962-2802
ISSN (electronic): 1477-0334
Publisher: Sage
URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280214550759
DOI: 10.1177/0962280214550759
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
