Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Xilin Xia,
Professor Qiuhua Liang,
Dr Xiaodong Ming,
Dr Jingming Hou
This is the final published version of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by Wiley-Blackwell, 2018.
For re-use rights please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
© 2017. American Geophysical Union. This document addresses the comments raised by Lu et al. (2017). Lu et al. (2017) proposed an alternative numerical treatment for implementing the fully implicit friction discretization in Xia et al. (2017). The method by Lu et al. (2017) is also effective, but not necessarily easier to implement or more efficient. The numerical wiggles observed by Lu et al. (2017) do not affect the overall solution accuracy of the surface reconstruction method (SRM). SRM introduces an antidiffusion effect, which may also lead to more accurate numerical predictions than hydrostatic reconstruction (HR) but may be the cause of the numerical wiggles. As suggested by Lu et al. (2017), HR may perform equally well if fine enough grids are used, which has been investigated and recognized in the literature. However, the use of refined meshes in simulations will inevitably increase computational cost and the grid sizes as suggested are too small for real-world applications.
Author(s): Xia X, Liang Q, Ming X, Hou J
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Water Resources Research
Print publication date: 01/01/2018
Online publication date: 28/12/2017
Acceptance date: 19/12/2017
Date deposited: 06/03/2018
ISSN (print): 0043-1397
ISSN (electronic): 1944-7973
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric