Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Stephanie Newell
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Focusing on the complexity of local spectators’ responses to the simple ideological formulae of colonial health and hygiene films, this article asks about the ways in which the presence of local aesthetic tastes and values represented a vital third space of mediation alongside film content and filmmakers’ “authorial” objectives in the much-studied media archives on public health and hygiene in colonial Africa.The article argues that a host of cognitive failures is encapsulated in colonial officials’ reports on the laughter of African audiences between the late 1920s and early 1950s. In attributing African laughter to unrefined “native” cruelty, colonial officials precluded the possibility of a politics of ridicule among audiences, among many other aesthetic and social practices affecting spectators’ reactionst o films.
Author(s): Newell S
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry
Year: 2017
Volume: 4
Issue: 3
Pages: 347-361
Print publication date: 01/09/2017
Online publication date: 14/08/2017
Acceptance date: 04/03/2017
ISSN (print): 2052-2614
ISSN (electronic): 2052-2622
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2017.27
DOI: 10.1017/pli.2017.27
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric