Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Timing of Staged Nonculprit Artery Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: COMPLETE Trial

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Vijay KunadianORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2019 American College of Cardiology FoundationBackground: The COMPLETE (Complete vs Culprit-only Revascularization to Treat Multi-vessel Disease After Early PCI for STEMI) trial demonstrated that staged nonculprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduced major cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of nonculprit-lesion PCI timing on major CV outcomes and also the time course of the benefit of complete revascularization. Methods: Following culprit-lesion PCI, 4,041 patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD were randomized to staged nonculprit-lesion PCI or culprit-lesion only PCI. Randomization was stratified according to investigator-planned timing of nonculprit-lesion PCI: during or after the index hospitalization. The first coprimary outcome was the composite of CV death or myocardial infarction (MI). In pre-specified analyses, hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for each time stratum. Landmark analyses of the entire population were performed within 45 days and after 45 days. Results: For nonculprit-lesion PCI planned during the index hospitalization (actual time: median 1 day), CV death or MI was reduced with complete revascularization compared with culprit-lesion only PCI (HR: 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59 to 1.00). For nonculprit lesion PCI planned to occur after hospital discharge (actual time: median 23 days), CV death or MI was also reduced with complete revascularization (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.97; interaction p = 0.62). Landmark analyses demonstrated an HR of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.24) during the first 45 days and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.89) from 45 days to the end of follow-up for intended nonculprit lesion PCI versus culprit lesion only PCI. Conclusions: Among STEMI patients with multivessel disease, the benefit of complete revascularization over culprit-lesion only PCI was consistent irrespective of the investigator-determined timing of nonculprit-lesion intervention. The benefit of complete revascularization on hard clinical outcomes emerged mainly over the long term.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Wood DA, Cairns JA, Wang J, Mehran R, Storey RF, Nguyen H, Meeks B, Kunadian V, Tanguay J-F, Kim H-H, Cheema A, Deghani P, Natarajan MK, Jolly SS, Amerena J, Keltai M, James S, Hlinomaz O, Niemela K, AlHabib K, Lewis BS, Nguyen M, Sarma J, Dzavik V, Della Siega A, Mehta SR

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Year: 2019

Volume: 74

Issue: 22

Pages: 2713-2723

Print publication date: 03/12/2019

Online publication date: 25/11/2019

Acceptance date: 27/09/2019

ISSN (print): 0735-1097

ISSN (electronic): 1558-3597

Publisher: Elsevier USA

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.051

DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.051


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share