Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Neelam Srivastava
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
This essay argues that Antonio Gramsci should be considered a postcolonial thinker. This is not an exercise in presenting the “legacy” of a European Marxist’s thought in the third world. The aim here, rather, is to determine the ways in which Gramscian thought can be read as anticolonial, and how he related empire to the hegemonic-subaltern dialectic that structured his political theories. I engage with Joseph Buttigieg’s well-known essay “Gramsci’s Method” in order to explore how the philological method adopted in the Prison Notebooks offers several important insights for postcolonial studies, and bears obvious connections to the work of the Subaltern Studies historians, especially in terms of how it is central to the retrieval of subaltern pasts. I further argue that Gramsci’s interest in the national-popular and in forms of progressive nationalism that were grounded in internationalist solidarity offers strong connections with Third-Worldist theories of liberation struggles, such as tricontinentalism and the work of Frantz Fanon. Applying Buttigieg’s reading of Gramsci’s anti-dogmatic philological method to Third-Worldism allows us to see how it renovated Marxism’s revolutionary scope and its emancipatory futures, and ultimately helped to decolonize Marxism.
Author(s): Srivastava N
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Italian Culture
Year: 2022
Volume: 40
Issue: 1
Pages: 49-60
Online publication date: 08/06/2022
Acceptance date: 02/04/2018
Date deposited: 16/08/2023
ISSN (print): 0161-4622
ISSN (electronic): 1559-0909
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01614622.2022.2058187
DOI: 10.1080/01614622.2022.2058187
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
