Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Piergiorgio GentileORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.The inclusion of biofunctional molecules with synthetic bone graft substitutes has the potential to enhance tissue regeneration during treatment of traumatic bone injuries. The clinical use of growth factors has though been associated with complications, some serious. The use of smaller, active peptides has the potential to overcome these problems and provide a cost-effective, safe route for the manufacture of enhanced bone graft substitutes. This review considers the design of peptide-enhanced bone graft substitutes, and how peptide selection and attachment method determine clinical efficacy. It was determined that covalent attachment may reduce the known risks associated with growth factor-loaded bone graft substitutes, providing a predictable tissue response and greater clinical efficacy. Peptide choice was found to be critical, but even within recognised families of biologically active peptides, the configurations that appeared to most closely mimic the biological molecules involved in natural bone healing processes were most potent. It was concluded that rational, evidence-based design of peptide-enhanced bone graft substitutes offers a pathway to clinical maturity in this highly promising field.
Author(s): Bullock G, Atkinson J, Gentile P, Hatton P, Miller C
Publication type: Review
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Year: 2021
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
Online publication date: 31/03/2021
Acceptance date: 24/03/2021
ISSN (electronic): 2079-4983
Publisher: MDPI AG
URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb12020022
DOI: 10.3390/jfb12020022
