Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Alexander PhillipsORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2022 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical OncologyBackground: The evidence assessing the additional benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT; i.e. chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) and oesophagectomy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are limited. This study aimed to determine whether AC improves long-term survival in patients receiving NAT and oesophagectomy. Methods: Patients receiving oesophagectomy for EAC following NAT from 2004 to 2016 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). To account for immortality bias, patients with survival ≤3 months were excluded to account for immortality bias. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression was performed to account for selection bias and analyze impact of AC on overall survival. Results: Overall, 12,972 (91%) did not receive AC and 1,255 (9%) received AC. After PSM there were 2,485 who did not receive AC and 1,254 who did. After matching, AC was associated with improved survival (median: 38.5 vs 32.3 months, p < 0.001), which remained after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.78, CI95%: 0.71–0.87). On multivariable interaction analyses, this benefit persisted in subgroup analysis for nodal status: N0 (HR: 0.85, CI95%: 0.69–0.96), N1 (HR: 0.66, CI95%: 0.56–0.78), N2/3 (HR: 0.80, CI95%: 0.66–0.97) and margin status: R0 (HR: 0.77, CI95%: 0.69–0.86), R1 (HR: 0.60, CI95%: 0.43–0.85). Further, patients with stable disease following NAT (HR: 0.60, CI95%: 0.59–0.80) or downstaged (HR: 0.80, CI95%: 0.68–0.95) disease had significant survival benefit after AC, but not patients with upstaged disease. Conclusion: AC following NAT and oesophagectomy is associated with improved survival, even in node-negative and margin-negative disease. NAT response may be crucial in identifying patients who will benefit maximally from AC, and thus future research should be focused on identifying molecular phenotype of tumours that respond to chemotherapy to improve outcomes.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Kamarajah SK, Markar SR, Phillips AW, Kunene V, Fackrell D, Salti GI, Dahdaleh FS, Griffiths EA

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Year: 2022

Volume: 48

Issue: 9

Pages: 1980-1987

Online publication date: 08/06/2022

Acceptance date: 02/04/2018

ISSN (print): 0748-7983

ISSN (electronic): 1532-2157

Publisher: W.B. Saunders Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.014

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.014

PubMed id: 35718676


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share