Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Murray Pollock
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2022, The Author(s). Many approaches for conducting Bayesian inference on discretely observed diffusions involve imputing diffusion bridges between observations. This can be computationally challenging in settings in which the temporal horizon between subsequent observations is large, due to the poor scaling of algorithms for simulating bridges as observation distance increases. It is common in practical settings to use a blocking scheme, in which the path is split into a (user-specified) number of overlapping segments and a Gibbs sampler is employed to update segments in turn. Substituting the independent simulation of diffusion bridges for one obtained using blocking introduces an inherent trade-off: we are now imputing shorter bridges at the cost of introducing a dependency between subsequent iterations of the bridge sampler. This is further complicated by the fact that there are a number of possible ways to implement the blocking scheme, each of which introduces a different dependency structure between iterations. Although blocking schemes have had considerable empirical success in practice, there has been no analysis of this trade-off nor guidance to practitioners on the particular specifications that should be used to obtain a computationally efficient implementation. In this article we conduct this analysis and demonstrate that the expected computational cost of a blocked path-space rejection sampler applied to Brownian bridges scales asymptotically at a cubic rate with respect to the observation distance and that this rate is linear in the case of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. Numerical experiments suggest applicability both of the results of our paper and of the guidance we provide beyond the class of linear diffusions considered.
Author(s): Mider M, Jenkins PA, Pollock M, Roberts GO
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability
Year: 2022
Volume: 24
Pages: 3007-3027
Print publication date: 01/12/2022
Online publication date: 14/07/2022
Acceptance date: 10/03/2022
Date deposited: 12/08/2022
ISSN (print): 1387-5841
ISSN (electronic): 1573-7713
Publisher: Springer Nature
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-022-09949-y
DOI: 10.1007/s11009-022-09949-y
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
