Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jo Smith Finley
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© 2022 The Society for Ethnographic Theory. All rights reserved.In his analysis of the frontier genocides waged against the Aboriginal Tasmanians, the Yuki of California, and the Herero of Namibia, Benjamin Madley (2004) identified three phases. The first is initiated by colonial invasion: economic and political frictions develop as settlers and indigenous peoples struggle for limited resources and power. In Phase Two, indigenous peoples attack settlers to reclaim lost resources and land, and this prompts a genocidal military campaign. In Phase Three, the settlers’ government incarcerates the indigenous peoples in concentration camps, where it continues genocide by attrition (through malnutrition, inadequate medical care, overwork, unsanitary conditions, and violence). All three genocides began with the assertion that the land was empty or should be made empty. Here, I consider how far the concept tabula rasa (“a map scraped clean”) applies to contemporary “re-educated” Xinjiang on China’s northwest frontier.
Author(s): Smith Finley J
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory
Year: 2022
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
Pages: 341-356
Acceptance date: 02/04/2018
ISSN (print): 2575-1433
ISSN (electronic): 2049-1115
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/720902
DOI: 10.1086/720902
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
