Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Lois Thomas,
Professor Elaine McColl,
Dr Nicolette Rousseau,
Dr Jennifer Soutter
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Background While nursing, midwifery and professions allied to medicine (PAMs) are increasingly using clinical guidelines to reduce inappropriate variations in practice and ensure higher quality care, there have been no rigorous overviews of their effectiveness in relation to these professions. We identified 18 evaluations of guidelines which met established quality for evaluations of interventions aimed at changing professional practice. This paper describes characteristics of guidelines evaluated and the effectiveness of different dissemination and implementation strategies used. Methods Guideline evaluations conducted since 1975 which used a randomized controlled trial, controlled before-and-after, or interrupted time-series design, were identified using a combination of database and hand searching. Findings It is mostly impossible to tell whether the guidelines evaluated were based on evidence. The most common method of guideline dissemination was the distribution of printed educational materials. Three studies compared different dissemination and/or implementation strategies: findings suggest educational interventions may be of value in the dissemination of guidelines and confer a benefit over passive dissemination.
Author(s): McColl E; Soutter J; Rousseau N; Thomas LH; Cullum N
Publication type: Review
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Advanced Nursing
Print publication date: 01/07/1999
ISSN (print): 0309-2402
ISSN (electronic): 1365-2648
PubMed id: 10403979