Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Rawls and research on cognitively impaired patients: A reply to Maio

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Derek Bell

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

In his paper, "The Relevance of Rawls' Principle of Justice for Research on Cognitively Impaired Patients" (Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (2002): 45-53), Giovanni Maio has developed a thought-provoking argument for the permissibility of non-therapeutic research on cognitively impaired patients. Maio argues that his conclusion follows from the acceptance of John Rawls's principles of justice, specifically, Rawls's "liberty principle". Maio has misinterpreted Rawls's "liberty principle" - correctly interpreted it does not support non-therapeutic research on cognitively impaired patients. Three other 'Rawlsian' arguments are suggested by Maio's discussion - two "self-respect" arguments and a "presumed consent" argument - but none of them are convincing. However, an alternative argument developed from Rawls's discussion of "justice in health care" in his most recent book, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, may justify certain kinds of non-therapeutic research on some cognitively impaired patients in special circumstances. We should not expect anything more permissive from a liberal theory of justice.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Bell DR

Publication type: Note

Publication status: Published

Journal: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

Year: 2003

Volume: 24

Issue: 5

Pages: 381-393

ISSN (print): 1386-7415

ISSN (electronic): 1573-1200

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:META.0000006823.03739.e3

DOI: 10.1023/B:META.0000006823.03739.e3

PubMed id: 14760867


Actions

Find at Newcastle University icon    Link to this publication


Share