Lookup NU author(s): Pallavi Mehrotra,
Dr Sarah Johnson,
Dr Viney Wadehra,
Dr David Richardson,
Professor Thomas Lennard
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Aims: Our thyroid cytology audit results of 1990-1995 showed an unsatisfactory rate of 43.1% and prediction of neoplasia with a sensitivity of 86.8%. Increasingly, ultrasound scan (USS)-guided core sampling for cytology is proving a valuable tool instead of freehand fine needle aspiration (FNA) or following unsatisfactory freehand FNA. We present the results of freehand FNA and USS-guided core samples for cytology in two separate patient groups in our centre. Methods: Patients who had a thyroid resection and preoperative thyroid cytology in our institution between 1996 and 2002 were included. The histological diagnoses were correlated with the preceding cytology results. Results: A total of 450 FNAs were performed on 394 patients. Freehand FNAs were performed for 348 (77.3%) samples and USS-guided core for 102 (22.7%) samples; 121 (26.8%) were repeat aspirates performed on 45 patients. Using aspiration cytology (AC) grading, freehand FNA was cytologically inadequate (AC0 or AC1) in 34.8% cases whereas USS-guided core was inadequate in 17.6% cases (P = 0.001). Freehand FNA (AC3, AC4, AC5) predicted neoplasia with a sensitivity of 83.2%, specificity of 46.6%, accuracy of 63.0%, positive predictive value of 56.0% and negative predictive value of 77.1%. USS-guided core sample for cytology (AC3, AC4, AC5) predicted neoplasia with a sensitivity of 93.5%, specificity of 26.0%, accuracy of 51.9%, positive predictive value of 43.9% and negative predictive value of 86.7%. Conclusions: Although USS-guided core provides more satisfactory specimens than freehand FNA, in our centre it does not provide increased accuracy. © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Author(s): Mehrotra, P., Viswanathan, H., Johnson, S., Wadehra, V., Richardson, D., Lennard, T.W.J.
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Print publication date: 01/06/2006
ISSN (print): 0956-5507
ISSN (electronic): 1365-2303
PubMed id: 16719856
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric