Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Circulating endothelial cells in patients with septic shock

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Mbithe Mutunga, Dr Barbara Fulton, Dr Robert Bullock, Andrew Batchelor, Dr Alistair Gascoigne, Professor James Gillespie, Dr Simon Baudouin

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

The Vascular endothelium has a central role in the control of microvascular tone, and it has been proposed that vascular endothelial damage occurs in septic shock, producing multiorgan failure. We have developed a method of detecting circulating endothelial cells (EC) that provides direct evidence of EC shedding in human sepsis. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were seeded in whole blood and recovered by isopycnic centrifugation to validate the technique. Blood samples were subsequently taken from 11 healthy volunteers, nine ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) control patients without sepsis, eight patients with sepsis but without shock, and 15 patients with septic shock. EC were identified by indirect immunofluorescence, using antibodies to von Willebrand factor (vWf) and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor KDR. Mean HUVEC recovery was 86% for 20 to 100 seeded cells/ml of blood. vWf-positive EC counts per milliliter were significantly higher (analysis of variance [ANOVA], p < 0.0001) in patients with sepsis (16.1 +/- 2.7 [mean +/- SEM]) and septic shock (30.1 +/- 3.3) than in healthy (1.9 +/- 0.5) or ICU controls (2.6 +/- 0.6). KDR-positive EC counts per milliliter were also significantly higher (ANOVA, p < 0.0001) in patients with sepsis (4.2 +/- 1.1/ml) and septic shock (10.4 +/- 1.2/ml) than in healthy (0.7 +/- 0.3/ml) or ICU controls (0.5 +/- 0.2/ml). Cell counts made with anti-vWf antibody were consistently higher than those made with anti KDR antibody, but correlation between the two counts was high (r(2) = 0.93). The number of circulating KDR-positive EC was significantly higher in patients who died of septic shock than in survivors (12.0 +/- 1.6/ml Versus 7.1 +/- 1.2/ml, p = 0.026). An increase in circulating EC can be identified during sepsis and septic shock. This supports the hypothesis that endothelial damage occurs in human sepsis.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Gillespie JI; Gascoigne A; Mutunga M; Batchelor A; Baudouin SV; Fulton B; Bullock R

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Year: 2001

Volume: 163

Issue: 1

Pages: 195-200

ISSN (print): 1073-449X

ISSN (electronic): 1535-4970

Publisher: American Thoracic Society


Actions

Find at Newcastle University icon    Link to this publication


Share