Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

ePrints

Dyslexia: a categorical falsehood without validity or utility

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Simon Gibbs

Downloads


Abstract

Children’s failure to develop proficiency in reading and writing continues to challenge educationalists, parents and carers. In this chapter we argue that the concept of dyslexia as an explanation for failure or as a starting point for intervention is fatally flawed. Our argument is that the concept is a socially constructed category with no scientific basis. Hence quasi-medical differential diagnosis is invalid and educationally divisive. We question this phenomenon, that persists despite the protestations of Stanovich (1994, 2005) and others, through a brief survey of work in the fields of social categorisation, cognitive psychology and neuroscience. In summary our view is that whilst there are some ‘natural’ tendencies to categorise, with regard to literacy there is no identified objectively defined and unambiguous discontinuity between skilled and unskilled reader. There is, therefore, no support for the persistence of a distinctive category of dyslexia. Further, the notion of ‘dyslexia’ in itself does not support appropriate intervention.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Gibbs S, Elliott J

Publication type: Article

Journal: Advances in Learning and Behavioural Disabilities

Year: 2010

Volume: 23

Pages: 287-301

Print publication date: 01/01/2010

ISSN (print): 0735-004X

ISSN (electronic): 1875-7960

Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S0735-004X(2010)0000023013

DOI: 10.1108/S0735-004X(2010)0000023013


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Actions

    Link to this publication


Share