Lookup NU author(s): Kati Blom
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The article is comparing six new office buildings in Helsinki area in Finland. The fashion of glass facade (Biocentre 3 by Olli-Pekka Jokela) is compared with the traditional wall structure (Innopoli 2 by Kaarina Lofstrom), and the kombi office plan of Arabiakeskus (by Arkkitehdit Tommila) is compared with open plan of Senate-building (by Heikkinen Komonen). The difficulties of office design are discussed in terms of economics and spatial organisation (Paciuksenkatu 21 by Tuomo Siitonen and AV keskus by ARK-house). The author acknowledges the difficulties with clashing aims in office design: that of flexibility and that of image provoking. In best cases the two aims are not compromised but clearly solved. In those cases the corporation has succeeded in finding a particular style of a particular architectural office matching with its image strategy; not so that the architectural office has been lucky in translating the goals of the corporation to architectural language.
Author(s): Blom K
Publication type: Article
Journal: ARK Arkkitehti The Finnish Architectural Review
ISSN (print): 0783-3660
Publisher: Suomen Arkkitehtiliitto
Notes: Article is in Finnish, the texts of the pictures are translated.