Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Preoperative optimization: rationale and process: is it economic sense?

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Christopher Snowden, Dr Helen Anderson

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Purpose of review The development of preoperative clinics and the increasing importance of the anaesthetist in the management of surgical risk have expanded the concept of preoperative optimization. This review will focus on the rationale and process for cost-effective preoperative optimization. Recent findings Postoperative morbidity, rather than mortality, is the most important surgical outcome in economic terms. Since preoperative comorbidity, in association with surgical complexity, is more predictive of hospital costs than the subsequent treatment of postoperative complications per se, preoperative optimization represents an appropriate economic target. Process management, including guidelines to reduce unnecessary investigations and specialist referrals and enhancing perioperative recovery, makes economical sense in the majority of patients who undergo noncardiac surgery with few complications. Preoperative optimization of a minority of high-risk surgical patients is also important given limited critical care resource. However, the evidence for specific optimization strategies in this latter group continues to evolve and requires further clarification in well designed trials. Summary The requirement for appropriate methods of risk stratification of surgical patients targeted at the reduction of postoperative morbidity, underpins the development of cost-effective preoperative optimization. Specific process-based and clinical measures may then be applied to the development of individualized perioperative care packages.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Snowden CP, Anderson H

Publication type: Review

Publication status: Published

Journal: Current Opinion in Anesthesiology

Year: 2012

Volume: 25

Issue: 2

Pages: 210-216

Print publication date: 01/04/2012

ISSN (print): 0952-7907

ISSN (electronic): 1473-6500

Publisher: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834ef903

DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834ef903


Share