Lookup NU author(s): Dr Ole Pedersen
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This article seeks to contribute to ongoing debates on the nature and foundations of environmental law. In doing so, the article accepts the claim made in much of the recent analytical environmental law scholarship that the discipline suffers from a lack of coherence. In a response to this claim, the article probes the potential reasons behind this incoherence. In relying on recent scholarship in the disciplines of social psychology and cultural cognition, the article argues that individual understanding of environmental risks in accordance with a priori held beliefs and values aided by cognitive biases, lends support to a scenario of multiple and diverse understandings of environmental problems. This diversity is in turn reflected in both the form and content of environmental law. In a response to this diversity and incoherence, the article identifies the philosophy of pragmatism and argues that a modest interpretation of pragmatism has the potential to alleviate the biases and heuristics that give rise to the individual understanding of environmental risks.
Author(s): Pedersen OW
Publication type: Article
Journal: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Print publication date: 25/10/2012
ISSN (print): 0143-6503
ISSN (electronic): 1464-3820
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric