Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

ePrints

Re-using 'uncomfortable heritage': The case of the 1933 Building, Shanghai

Lookup NU author(s): Professor John Pendlebury, Dr Andrew Law

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

This paper opens up a discussion over the processes of forgetting and remembering that occur in the adaptive reuse of quite commonplace buildings that, nevertheless, have been classified as ‘heritage’. For most buildings survival depends upon finding a new economic use once original use has ceased. At this point decisions are also made about what stories are carried forward from the building’s past. The principal case study discussed in this paper is the former Shanghai Municipal Abattoir, a modernist concrete sculpture now branded 1933 Shanghai. The paper delineates how a process of ‘strategic forgetting and selective remembrance’ has been undertaken, negotiating the bloody nature of the building’s past, in its reuse as an upscale commercial venue. Reuse is further considered within the wider frames of a 1920-1930s Shanghai urban branding ‘imaginary’ and as a ‘building of control and reform’ – a category of buildings developed from the eighteenth-century European Enlightenment-thinking. In reflecting upon this negotiation in the heritage making process with potentially difficult past events, we propose the category of ‘uncomfortable heritage’, as part of a wider spectrum of ‘dark heritage’, and conclude with a final reflection upon 1933 Shanghai as a heterotopic space.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Pendlebury J, Wang Y, Law A

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: International Journal of Heritage Studies

Year: 2018

Volume: 24

Issue: 3

Pages: 211-229

Online publication date: 07/08/2017

Acceptance date: 29/07/2017

ISSN (print): 1352-7258

ISSN (electronic): 1470-3610

Publisher: Routledge

URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1362580

DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2017.1362580


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Actions

    Link to this publication


Share